What HR Managers And Business Owners Need To Know About "Onboarding" New H-1B Employees?


October 1st marks the beginning of the “onboarding” of new H-1B employees at many companies throughout the United States. Winning the lottery and having H-1B Petitions approved by United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS)[1] were just two initial steps involved in the hiring and retaining process of talented foreign nationals in the United States. Carefully onboarding the H-1B employee is as crucial as selecting, hiring and bringing them into the United States (or assisting in changing their nonimmigrant status in the United States). This article briefly addresses few very basic but very important topics that HR Managers, HR Professionals and Business Owners should be aware of, and religiously comply with, in order to avoid potential pitfalls pertaining to the onboarding of new H-1B employees.

Diligently Complete Employment Eligibility Verification (Form I-9) Requirements.

Form I-9 is used for verifying the identity and employment authorization of individuals hired for employment in the United States. All U.S. employers must ensure proper completion of Form I-9 for each individual they hire for employment in the United States. Form I-9 is made up of three sections.

Newly hired employees, including H-1B employees, must complete Section 1 of Form I-9 no later than the first day of employment. Each employee hired on or after November 7, 1986, must complete the designated portion of the I-9 Form. Form I-9 requires the employee to attest, under penalty of perjury, that he or she is authorized to work in the United States as a U.S. citizen, lawful permanent resident, or nonimmigrant with a time-limited form of work authorization. Within three (3) business days of hire, the employee must also submit certain original documents that establish identity and employment authorization to the employer for review. Employers cannot specify which document(s) employees may present from the Lists of Acceptable Documents, found on the last page of Form I-9, to establish identity and employment authorization.

Employers or their authorized representative must complete Section 2 of the I-9 Form by examining evidence of identity and employment authorization submitted by the employee within three (3) business days of the employee’s first day of employment. If the employee has provided a document expiration date in the employee’s section of the I-9 Form, the employer also must re-verify the employee’s employment eligibility before that date has passed. The employer must retain the completed I-9 Form for at least three (3) years or one (1) year after employment terminates, whichever is later. This is referred to as the “retention period.”

Employers who do not complete and retain I-9 Forms for every employee hired on or after November 7, 1986, may face civil fines by the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)[2] for failing to properly prepare each I-9 Form. The severity of the penalty is be determined by: (i) the size of the business; (ii) the employer's good faith efforts to comply with the law; (iii) the number of unauthorized employees; and (iv) whether the employer has a history of violations. In addition, ICE may impose civil sanctions for each unauthorized foreign national employee. Note that the Employers are liable for both “actual” and “constructive” knowledge that an employee is not authorized to work. There are other sanctions and penalties involved which are beyond the scope of this article.

Comply with LCA Requirements to Avoid DOL’s Investigation.

Since 1990, all employers submitting H-1B visa petitions must first have a Labor Condition Application (“LCA”) certified by the U.S. Department of Labor’s (DOL) Employment and Training Administration. The LCA requires employers to attest that: (i) the H*I B nonimmigrant will be paid at least the local prevailing wage[3] or the employer’s actual wage, whichever is higher, and paid for non-productive time; (ii) the H-1B nonimmigrant will be offered benefits on the same basis as U.S. workers; (iii) employment of H-1B nonimmigrants will not adversely affect the wages and working conditions of similarly employed workers; (iv) there is no strike, lockout, or work stoppage; and (v) notice of the LCA filing has either been posted for at least ten (10) days or provided to the bargaining representative, if one exists.

The DOL’s Wage and Hour Division (“WHD”) receives complaints by aggrieved persons or organizations or through its own initiated investigation relating to misrepresentation or failure of the employer to meet the conditions stated in the LCA. An aggrieved employee has twelve (12) months after the latest date on which the alleged violations were committed to file a complaint with the DOL; however, this Statute of Limitation (SoL) does not apply to an employer’s back pay liability.

WHD may conduct investigations, enforcement proceedings, and impose sanctions on employers that violate the LCA provisions. Violations may include: (i) making a material representation on an LCA; (ii) willful failure to pay the required wage or to provide the required working conditions; (iiii ) filing an LCA during a strike; (iv) failing to provide notice of the LCA filing; (v) substantial failure to be specific on the application; (vii) charging an employee an “early-termination penalty”; and (viii) failing to post notice of the filing of the LCA for at least ten (10) days.

In response to any of these violations, the WHD may: (i) assess civil monetary penalties; (ii) require the employer to pay back wages to aggrieved workers; and/or (iii) bar the employer from filing LCAs, employment-based immigrant petitions, and H, L, O, or P nonimmigrant petitions for at least one (1) year. The DOL may also impose other administrative remedies. Additionally, criminal sanctions may be imposed for the knowing submission of false statements to the U.S. Federal Government.

Be Aware of the 30/60 Days Rule to Start the Payroll & Payment of Salary in “Inactive Status”

Regulations require that employers must begin paying LCA-stated wages when the employee “makes him/herself available for work” but not later than 30 days of employee’s entry or 60 days from Change of Status if in the U.S. Liability begins to accrue when the person “enters into employment” with the employer. Thus, even if the worker has not yet “entered into employment,” when the H-1B worker is present in the U.S. on the date of the approval of the H-1B petition, the employer shall pay to the worker the required wage beginning 60 days after the date the worker becomes eligible to work for the sponsoring employer. The H-1B worker becomes “eligible to work” for employer on the date set forth in the approved H-1B petition filed by the employer.

An employer must continue to pay an H-1B employee who is not working due to a nonproductive status at the direction of the employer (e.g., benching because of lack of work, lack of a permit or license). This regulation applies even if the H-1B employee is receiving training either provided by the employer or through some other external arrangement at the direction of the employer. Thus, the employer is liable for both nonproductive time as well as productive time once employee becomes eligible for work. Employers who do not pay non-terminated H-1 B employees may face civil penalties. Employers are, therefore, advised to pay an H- I B employee his or her salary as listed on the LCA until that employee has been terminated and the USCIS has been notified of the request to withdraw the H- IB Petition.

Changes in Employee Work Location/Terms of Employment: Whether or Not to Submit New/Amended Petition.

A new or amended petition is not needed when LCA has been filed and certified for the new employment location, the appropriate worksite posting has taken place, and other wage and hour obligations are met. No amended petition would be required regardless of when the LCA was filed and certified, as long as the certification took place before the employee was moved. Thus, if H-1B approved for site A and person is transferred to site B and there are LCAs for both sites, an amended H-1B petition is not necessary. However, if the person never worked at site A then a new (not simply amended) petition must be filed in order for the H-1B employee to work at site B.

Regulations also require an H-1B employer to notify the USCIS of any changes in the terms and conditions of employment of an H-1B employee which may “materially”affect “eligibility” under the H category. A new or amended petition must be filed where: (1) the location of employment has changed and is outside the area of employment specified on the LCA, but no new LCA has been filed; (2) there is a change in duties from one specialty occupation to another; or (3) there is a “material change” in the terms and conditions of employment.

What Regulations Say About "Roving" H-1B Employees.

An employer who needs to temporarily place an H-1B nonimmigrant worker in a place of employment that is not listed on an existing certified LCA may do so under the short-term placement provision without filing a new LCA for the temporary geographic area of employment. Note that this provision may only be used for an H-1B nonimmigrant worker who is already in the United States and working for the employer.

There are certain obligations that employersneed to satisfy when utilizing the short-term placement option. Specifically, the employer must pay that worker: (a) The required wage rate (applicable to the permanent work site on the supporting LCA); (b) The actual cost of lodging (for each workday and non-workday); and (c) The actual cost of travel, meals, and incidental or miscellaneous expenses (for each workday and non-workday).

Additionally, there are certain limitations too for using the short-term placement option. An employer may place an H-1B worker in short-term placement only if there is no strike/lockout in progress in the H-1B worker’s occupation at the short-term location and the employer does not already have an LCA on file for the geographic area of employment. Moreover, the placement of the individual H-1B worker at any site in an area of employment should not exceed 30 workdays (consecutive or non-consecutive) within a one-year period. Such placement may be for an additional 30 workdays, but for no more than 60 workdays, in a one year period, where the employer is able to show that the H-1B nonimmigrant maintains ties to the home worksite (e.g., a dedicated workstation at the permanent worksite; the employee’s abode is located near that worksite), and the worker spends a substantial amount of time at the permanent worksite.

First Come, First Serve: Potential Benefits of Starting the Green Card Process Early for H-1B Employees.

It is never too early to start the Green Card process, especially if the H-1B workers are from India and China[4] or other quota countries. For H-1B workers from India, it may take more than a decade to finally obtain an employment-based Green Card[5]. With such a humungous wait time, it does make a difference to have H-1B workers join the Green Card wait line as early as possible. Understandable, joining the Green Card cue may not provide any immediate relief to the H-1B workers but it may allow spouses of certain H-1B workers to work if they are able to show an intention to live and work in the United States permanently.

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is currently in the process of finalizing a proposed rule that may extend employment authorization to dependent spouses (not dependent children) of certain H-1B workers. The new proposed rule would allow H-4 dependent spouses of certain H-1B nonimmigrant workers to request employment authorization, as long as the H-1B worker has already started the process of seeking lawful permanent residence through employment. Eligible individuals would include H-4 dependent spouses of principal H-1B workers who: (1) Are the beneficiaries of an approved Form I-140, Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker; or (2) Have been granted an extension of their authorized period of stay in the United States under the American Competitiveness in the Twenty-first Century Act of 2000 (“AC21”) as amended by the 21st Century Department of Justice Appropriations Authorization Act. Details about the proposed rule and when it may come out can be gathered from our previously published article, When And In Which Form The H-4 Employment Authorization Rule Will Come Out?


Onboarding H-1B employees require strictly adhering to the H-1B regulations and many practical nuances associated with those regulations. Although H-1B regulations have been called a “Toothless Tiger” in the past, they certainly are not. HR Managers, HR Professionals and Business Owners should ‘Play it Safe’ when it comes to handling the onboarding of new H-1B employees as not abiding by the regulations may result in huge monetary fines and/or civil/criminal charges. There is also a possibility of getting the Employer debarred from using the H-1B program in future, and it could even impact using other nonimmigrant and immigrant visa categories for any future projects.

[1] an agency of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) that oversees lawful immigration to the United States.

[2] Principal investigative arm of the DHS

[3] If required to pay the prevailing wage, the wage must be 100% of the Federally-Mandated Prevailing Wage Rate.

[4] mainland born

[5] Projections based on November 2014 Visa Bulletin released by the Department of State.

About The Author

Michael Phulwani Michael Phulwani is admitted to practice law in India, New York and New Jersey. He has been practicing law for about 39 years in the field of Immigration and Nationality Law. He is admitted to practice law in New Jersey, New York, and India. He maintains law office in Maywood New Jersey, and in Mumbai India.. He has successfully handled many complex immigration matters with the Immigration and Naturalization Service and consular processing cases at American Consulates abroad especially consular posts in India. Michael Phulwani is the author of 'Guide to U.S. Visas' and numerous articles published in various ethnic newspapers and other publications in the U.S. and abroad such as News India, India Tribune and Gujarat Times. He has also co-authored a series of articles on American Consulates in India, Pakistan and Bangladesh published in "The Visa Processing Guide" by American Immigration Lawyers Association.

David Nachman David Nachman is the founder and one of the Managing Attorneys in the Nachman Phulwani Zimovcak (NPZ) Law Group, P.C., a pre-eminent International Immigration and Nationality Law Firm dedicated to providing a wide array of business and family immigration law services for skilled U.S.- and Canada-bound workers. Attorney Nachman and fellow lawyers contributed to landmark decisions in such cases as Berger v. Berger and Woolley v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc. The NPZ Law Group is an International Immigration Law Firm with offices in NJ and NY. The Firm has affiliated offices in Canada and India. The Firm specializes in providing assistance with waivers, removal defense, asylum, PERM, immigrant (Green Card) and various nonimmigrant visas, and immigration compliance matters for employers and employees and their families. Immigration professionals in NPZ Law Group speak many foreign languages including, but not limited to: Spanish, French, Japanese, Korean, Tamil, Hindi, Gujarati, Nepalese, Slovak, Czech, Russian, Polish, Tagalog, Hebrew, Chinese, German and English.

Rabindra Singh Rabindra K. Singh is a Staff Attorney in the Ridgewood, New Jersey, office of Nachman Phulwani Zimovcak (NPZ) Law Group, P.C. He is admitted to practice law in New Jersey, and India. Rabindra's work at NPZ focuses on complex employment and family-based immigration matters. From individuals to startups to multinational corporations, he has advised clients in a variety of industries, with a primary focus on the high tech, engineering, manufacturing, pharmaceutical, and financial industries. He represents clients before various immigration agencies of the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Labor, and the Department of State. Rabindra's professional work experience also entails working with one of world's largest Information Technology (IT) Company, where he played a pivotal role in initiating the in-house processing of nonimmigrant visas. An avid writer, Rabindra writes frequently for both print and electronic media. His articles have appeared in the prestigious New Jersey Law Journal. In addition, he is a frequent contributor to the ILW.COM. Additionally, he actively writes articles for ethnic Indian newspapers.

The opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the opinion of ILW.COM.